Professor Obi Wiki

Professor Joseph Chikelue Obi | Chikelue Obi | Professor Joseph Obi | Joseph Chikelue | Professor Obi | Joseph Chikelue Obi | Joseph Obi | Dr Joseph Obi | Doctor Joseph Obi | Prof Obi | Dr Joseph Chikelue Obi | Doctor Joseph Chikelue Obi | Doctor Obi | Dr Obi

Professor Obi | Have Your Say | Professor Joseph Obi | Black UK Politics Blog | Professor Joseph Chikelue Obi on Twitter

Featured Readers Responses [2] to My Tweets :

Dear Professor Obi,

I am disgusted at Chuka Umunna's GREED , NARCISSM , SELFISHNESS , WICKEDNESS AND COWARDICE !

Do you know that Streatham Constituency Staff were kind enough to tell the poor Doctor's Mother that "CHUKA PRIVATELY SAID THAT HE DID NOT WANT HIS OWN MOTHER TO END UP LIKE ABBAS KHAN'S MOTHER , AND THAT HE WAS (PERSONALLY) NOT READY TO GO TO SYRIA TO RISK HIS LIFE FOR ABBAS." ?

In my opinion , if Chuka Umunna MP did not want to save the Poor Asian Doctor (Abbas Khan) , then he should have buggered off , and allowed others to go and save the day.

Yet Chuka wickedly went behind the Khan family's back and started spreading falsehoods , before VICIOUSLY SABOTAGING (and Blocking) the whole trip , simply because (IT NOW APPEARS) that he did not want George Galloway and Lord Ahmed to go it alone - and put him to shame by bringing the Doctor back ALIVE !

I repeat - That innocent Muslim Doctor was primarily abandoned to die just because Chuka Umunna was scared that George Galloway would (politically) earn favour in the eyes of Streatham's constituents.

Chuka Umunna is Pure Evil - and so is Ed Miliband ; because both of them were ready to sacrifice a Poor Asian Muslim's life just to childishly get back at (their Arch-Enemy) George Galloway (and the Respect Party) !

Do you know that Mr Umunna recently grabbed over a Hundred Thousand Pounds in Donations from Wealthy Companies - all in the name of his Work ?

I know for a fact that my ex company recently gave almost £100000 (ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND POUNDS) to Chuka Umunna.

I also know that he is using his Streatham Constituency MP Status to feather his own nest - without giving a damn about Poor People.

Chuka Umunna is craftily using his Streatham Constituency Seat as a springboard for staying on as Shadow Cabinet Minister for Business (where the actual money is). He doesn't give a damn about Streatham.

(CLICK HERE FOR PROOF ABOUT THE DONATIONS).

(CLICK HERE FOR PROOF ABOUT WHAT HE REALLY THINKS ABOUT POOR PEOPLE).

(CLICK HERE FOR PROOF ABOUT HOW HE USES HIS STREATHAM SEAT TO MINGLE WITH CELEBRITIES).

YET WHERE WAS CHUKA UMUNNA WHEN DOCTOR ABBAS KHAN WAS DYING , SPLUTTERING , AND SCREAMING FOR HELP ?

Yours Faithfully ,

- (Anonymous) Ex-Member of Staff from Price Waterhouse Coopers (PWC)

CLICK HERE FOR THE FULL STORY

Labour star 'foiled bid to save Syrian Doctor : Family's fury at Chuka Umunna's failure to act to secure release of a 'martyr'

* Dr Abbas Khan died in Syria this week while being held prisoner

* He was just four days away from being released from jail

* His family say Labour MP Chuka Umunna failed to act to save him

* Claim Umunna stopped a delegation going to Syria to lobby for his release

CLICK HERE FOR THE FULL STORY

RESPONSE FROM PROFESSOR JOSEPH OBI :

* Chuka Umunna has the right to beg Big Companies to Fund Him.

* Big Companies like PWC also have the right to dish out Billions of Dollars to whoever they so choose.

* However , it is up to Streatham Electorate to Directly Write to these Big Companies to clarify whether such Monies were accepted in their Name - and if so - What Exactly was done with such Cash ?

* It is also up to Streathamites to challenge Mr Umunna as to whether he really cares about them , or not ; as secretly despising one's constituents (while tactfully feathering one's own nest) is not a crime either.

* Please also be advised that Chuka Umunna is fully entitled to be as Narcissistic (and as Smug) as he chooses , for as long as his (Long Suffering) Streatham Constituents can (duly) Tolerate him.

* Concerning Chuka's reported comments about not wanting his own Mother to end up like Doctor Abbas Khan's Mother - We have a Sensational Inside Scoop on the way (Fully Inclusive of the equally naughty Ed Miliband and William Hague) - So Do Stay Tuned !

* As previously stated - Let this be a Lesson to you all : Black UK Politicians are not always (necessarily) as helpful as one would expect , most especially during Times of Crisis.

* Black Voters , (plus others), duly elected Chuka into Power as their MP - So it is better to Deal with it via the Ballot Box if you are not happy with his Stewardship.

* Chuka Umunna currently has a relatively small Parliamentary Constituency Majority ; so Voting Him Out of Parliament would not be all that hard - if all of the Asians (and Muslims) got together and Voted for EITHER the Liberal Democrats or the Green Party.

* In the Interim , please Calm Down and Sip Tea !

Professor Obi | Wiki | Blog

Professor Obi Blog | Medical Council News | Ireland Leads The Way | No Immunity For Former Medical Council President | Source - Irish Times | Click Here For The Full Article

A former president of the Irish Hospital Consultants’ Association has been found guilty of “poor professional performance” by a fitness to practice inquiry of the Medical Council.

Dr Colm Quigley is the clinical director at Wexford General Hospital and is himself a former president of the Medical Council.

The findings will now be forwarded to the board of the Medical Council who will deliberate and decide on what sanctions – if any – will be imposed on Dr Quigley.

The finding of poor professional performance of a doctor is distinct from from from the more serious accusation of “professional misconduct”, which was not levelled against him.

The case relates to a patient – known only as Patient X – who was referred by his GP to Dr Quigley’s private clinic at the Ely Hospital at Ferrybank, Co Wexford on August 27, 2009.

Patient X was said to have been suffering from a number of complaints including low sodium in the blood.

After the consultation, Dr Quigley wrote to Patient X’s GP and said he would be carrying out a series of tests on Patient X. These tests were never carried out. Patient X died of inoperable lung cancer on April 16th, 2011. There is no allegation that Dr Quigley caused deterioration in the patient’s health or in any way contributed to his death.

Dr Quigley told the inquiry he believed subsequent examination of medical records had shown Patient X had not contracted the cancer that killed him in 2010 – and so the missing tests in 2009 could not have revealed it.

However, the committee found Dr Quigley was guilty of “poor professional performance” in failing to arrange the tests, failing to recognise the tests had not been carried out, and failing to have “any adequate system” in place for tracking or monitoring tests.

He was also guilty of failing to “respond adequately” to letters and phone calls over a number of months by Patient X, his wife, and his GP enquiring as to why the tests had not yet been carried out.

It was proven beyond reasonable doubt that Dr Quigley, in or after the first consulation in August, failed to “ensure” the tests were carried out – but this was not deemed to constitute “poor professional performance”.

Dr Quigley was found not guilty of allegations that at consultations in August and December 2009, he failed to take “any adequate history” or undertake “any adequate examination” of Patient X.

He was also found not guilty of an allegation that he “failed to maintain adequate records in respect of the care afforded” to Patient X.

During closing statements, Neasa Bird, for the Medical Council, said Dr Quigley had been unable to provide an explanation or excuse as to why the series of tests were not carried out.

The crux of the prosecution case hung on the argument that Dr Quigley had not been responsible for one mistake, but “a series of errors over a long period of time”. She said this amounted to a case of poor professional performance.

In his closing statement, Paul Anthony McDermott, counsel for Dr Quigley, said his client’s position was the same as it had been from the outset – that “a mistake” had occurred.

He said Dr Quigley had an otherwise “unblemished” record.

“What this case does establish is that paper-based systems can go wrong. Ireland is moving towards computer-based systems which should ensure that something like this never happens again.”

He said it was “ironic” that Dr Quigley was the subject of an inquiry having “spent much of his time protecting patients in the role as clinical director (at Wexford General Hospital)”.

Concerning allegations from the Medical Council that Dr Quigley had implicated himself with an admission that his handling of Patient X had “fallen below (his) standards”, Mr McDermott said this was “unfair”.

“His standards are unusually high and he has been a perfectionist. It’s unfair to turn that approach on him and use his own evidence to condemn him. He said ‘I wanted to do better’ and that is being used against him.”

The committee heard Dr Quigley has made “significant changes” to his practice, including the reduction of the number of patients he sees. “He is making changes to make sure this never happens again,” added Mr McDermott.